From: J. Bruce Fields (bfields@fieldses.org)
Date: 02/02/05-11:04:36 AM Z
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:04:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [nfsv4] ethereal and NFSv4 support. Message-ID: <20050202170436.GB1266@fieldses.org> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Manish Agarwal wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Is anyone using ethereal for NFS4 development work? I would like to > > know if it supports the current version of NFS4 (based on nfs4_prot.x > > version 1.122). At citi we certainly do this every day and I haven't noticed it parsing NFSv4 incorrectly lately. > > The comments in the ethereal source (version 0.10.9) mentions that the > > support it based on RFC 3010 and nfs4_prot.x 1.103. Does anyone know > > if just the comment is old or it really doesn't support the current > > version of nfs4_prot.x which is 1.122. > > > > It would be nice someone can post nfs4_prot.x version 1.103. It will > > make the task of verifying support and also adding the missing parts > > much easier. I don't know of a source for the old nfs4_prot.x's; it might be useful. I suspect it's the comment that's out of date, though. --b. _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-02:13:52 AM Z CST