Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05 draft]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Nicolas Williams (Nicolas.Williams@sun.com)
Date: 01/27/03-10:58:37 AM Z 

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:58:37 -0600
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05  draft]
Message-ID: <20030127105837.V16765@binky.central.sun.com>

Form K would replace the ligature with "f" and "i" - not the other way
around.

Nico

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:46:06PM -0800, Noveck, Dave wrote:
> OK, so where did I go wrong?
> 
>      a) ligature fi followed by "le" and the string "file" are 
>         compatibility equivalent.
> 
>      b) If two strings are compatibility equivalent, then
>         under a K-style normalization form, only one of them
>         can be valid.
>  
>      c) The compatibility composition of "file" is the ligature
>         fi followed by "le".
> 
>      d) Thus ligature fi followed by the string "le" is valid 
>         under normalization form KC.
> 
>      e) The string "file" is invalid under normalization form KC.
> 
> QED.
> 
> So if the result e) is false, which of a), b), c), d) are false?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:50 AM Z CST