Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05 draft]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Mike Eisler (mike@eisler.com)
Date: 01/24/03-12:45:14 PM Z


Message-ID: <3E3189BA.4E535701@eisler.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:45:14 -0800
From: Mike Eisler <mike@eisler.com>
Subject: Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05  draft]

Mike Eisler wrote:
> 
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
> 
> > Er, no, utf8str_cs requires that a normalization form be used, just not
> > on the wire.  So the problem of legacy filesystems remains even if we do
> > not act to recommend or require a specific normalization form on the
> > wire.
> 
> It requires a normalization form only if the server is case insensitive.
> 
> > > At least I feel the need for a "Normalization Forms for Dummies" document.
> > > Maybe other working group members do as well.  Any pointers to something
> > > that will explain this stuff to those who have not already immersed
> > > themsleves in this area.
> >
> > There are several books with "Unicode" in the title (none in my office
> > right now).  And the Unicode home page is a good place to start:
> >
> > http://www.unicode.org/
> 
> I find each visit to unicode.org ever more confusing. My most
> recent visit revealed that "16 bit" Unicode now has over 2^64 characters.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

try: "over 2^16 characters". Point holds though.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:48 AM Z CST